Sen. Lee Statement on Supplemental FBI Report

Oct 4, 2018

WASHINGTON – Sen. Mike Lee (R-UT) issued the following statement Thursday after reading the FBI’s supplemental background investigation into Supreme Court nominee Judge Kavanaugh. “The new information in the supplemental FBI report does not corroborate the allegations made against Judge Kavanaugh. I look forward to voting for his confirmation imminently.”

November 2, 2018 – Mobile Office Visit to Cache County

Oct 2, 2018

What: Mobile Office Visit to Logan When: Friday, November 2, 2018 @ 1:30 pm – 2:30 pm Where: Logan Library, Bonneville Rm, 255 North Main, Logan, UT 84321

Sen. Lee Comments on New Free Trade Agreement

Oct 1, 2018

WASHINGTON – Sen. Mike Lee (R-UT) issued the following statement Monday after President Trump announced a new trade agreement with Canada and Mexico. “While NAFTA laid an important foundation for trade liberalization, the decades-old agreement needed an update in light of our rapidly changing global economy,” Sen. Lee said. “I welcome news that President Trump has reached a new agreement with Canada and Mexico and I look forward to studying it closely.”

Sen. Lee Statement on Kavanaugh Nomination

Sep 28, 2018

WASHINGTON – Sen. Mike Lee (R-UT) issued the following statement Friday after the Senate Judiciary Committee voted to favorably recommend the confirmation of Supreme Court nominee Judge Kavanaugh. “The Senate Judiciary Committee completed a professional investigation of Dr. Ford’s allegation this week. But since some of my colleagues believe one more week of FBI investigation will bring us closer to truth I support that investigation and I look forward to voting for Judge Kavanaugh soon.”

Sen Lee Comments on Today’s Supreme Court Confirmation Hearing

Sep 27, 2018

WASHINGTON - Sen. Mike Lee (R-UT) issued the following statement after today’s Judiciary Committee Hearing. “Today’s hearing was heart wrenching. Both witnesses have suffered, and both offered brave and compelling testimony. “The Judiciary Committee has conducted an investigation into Dr. Ford’s allegation. Despite deliberate obstruction of that investigation by Committee Democrats, we now have sworn statements from all those named by Dr. Ford at the alleged incident. None of them remembers the incident ever happening. “I believe Dr. Ford was the victim of a crime. I do not believe Judge Kavanaugh committed it, and no corroborating evidence suggests he did. “Brett Kavanaugh is a good man, and a great judge. He belongs on the Supreme Court for the fall term, and back on the sidelines at Blessed Sacrament for the fall basketball season. Judge Kavanaugh has my vote.”

Make Trade with Britain Great Again

Sep 21, 2018

It is undeniable that the United States and the United Kingdom have a “special relationship.” Throughout periods of global change, and in times of tumult and war, the Anglo-American relationship has been constant. We have stood beside each other through two world wars, the Cold War, and now in our confrontation with global terrorism in a shared pursuit of freedom, peace, and prosperity.

And our trading partnership has been a major element of that relationship. Now, with the scheduled departure of Britain from the European Union, there is the possibility of a free trade agreement between the U.S. and the U.K., an opportunity that would immensely benefit our two nations.

Prior to this, we were not able to have true free trade with Britain precisely because it was a member of the EU. But after March 2019, when Britain is scheduled to make its departure, it will regain its freedom to make its own trade agreements.

Our trading relationship has already been mutually beneficial up to this point. After the EU, the United States is the United Kingdom’s largest trading partner; and the United Kingdom is the 7th largest trading partner of the United States. In 2015 alone, the U.S. exported more than $56 billion worth of goods and services to the U.K. – a sum that was almost identical to the value of U.K. exports to American exports.

On top of this, the U.S. economy is the largest in the world, while the U.K.’s is fifth largest. The size of our economies, combined with our significant trading relationship, would mean that a free trade agreement would significantly advance prosperity on both sides of the Atlantic. Competition would increase, and consumers would have more choices and lower prices. It would be a force generator for economic liberty through genuine bilateral free trade, based upon the principles of sovereignty and economic freedom.

Fortunately, several think tanks and scholars across the U.S. and the U.K. have collaborated to put together an free trade agreement. They have drafted a full, complete text for an agreement that makes significant progress towards the end of trade liberalization between our countries. And these scholars have proven that a full free trade agreement can be done.

And this is exactly what we should be working towards as Britain moves to exit the EU. We ought to be supporting the decision of the British people, and taking steps to ensure that a post-Brexit UK – and the world – can realize the economic and strategic possibilities that full British sovereignty presents.

That is why I also worked with Senator Cotton to introduce the United Kingdom Trade Continuity Act with Senator Cotton last Congress. Our bill would promote economic stability and growth as the U.K. transitions out of the EU by obligating the U.S. to continue and honor all existing commercial agreements with the U.K., and by calling on the President to initiate negotiations for new bilateral agreements with the U.K. 30 days after the bill is enacted.

Steps like these would preserve and promote our special relationship with the United Kingdom. And there would be no better way to do so than by instituting a free trade agreement between our two nations.

A Community Based Response to the Opioid Crisis

Sep 21, 2018

No state has been spared from the scourge of the opioid epidemic. In 2016 alone, 42,000 Americans died due to opioid-related overdoses– or about 115 Americans per day.

Our state of Utah has also been badly hit: nearly 6 Utahns die per week from opioid-related overdoses and three rural Utah counties were identified recently by the U.S. Department of Agriculture as being among the most vulnerable nationwide.

We cannot let this tragic epidemic continue without a fight. And thankfully, Utahns have already been stepping up to the plate.

For years, groups like the Utah Coalition for Opioid Overdose Prevention and the Utah Department of Health have worked diligently to combat this crisis. And since last year, Utah Attorney General Sean Reyes and DEA District Agent Brian Besser have complemented their efforts by forming the Utah Opioid Task Force, which I have been honored to serve on as Co-Chair.

Task Force Members have traveled across the state educating citizens on the perils of opioid dependency and the importance of treating addiction as a disease. They have promoted Naloxone use by first responders, a powerful medication that can often reverse an opioid overdose. They have backed successful DEA and attorney general prosecutions of drug cartel players, and supported various treatment and recovery services.

Furthermore, the Task Force also has worked with physicians to change prescribing practices. As a result, opioid prescriptions have been on the decline.

These initiatives have yielded real results around our state. Similar efforts can work in every state in the union, if given time and space to tailor themselves to specific local needs. But just as we know the opioids crisis has many sources, we know it’s going to have at least as many solutions.

And we also know – from common sense and hard experience – that unaccountable federal grant programs aren’t going to help. Unfortunately, the opioid legislation recently passed in Washington features just that: dozens of grant programs with little accountability for how these dollars will be spent and minimal measurement of their effectiveness.

To be sure, I am not opposed to the entirety of the bill. There are some good measures that could produce real results. For example:

The bill strengthens the Customs and Border Protection’s authority to discover and destroy packages containing illegal controlled substances;

It establishes a system to identify and stop suspicious orders of opioids from drug manufacturers and distributors;

And it requires the FDA to review challenges and barriers of developing non-addictive pain medications, and to update its processes to ensure it is capable of assessing the safety and effectiveness of novel drugs before approving them.

Unfortunately, these measures did not come to the Senate floor for us to consider individually. Instead, they were lumped together with dozens of other bills in this 350-page package. And each Senator was forced to either support or oppose the entire package.

It is crucial to recognize that there is no single opioids crisis. There are dozens. There is a rural crisis, and an urban one that is different. There is a crisis hitting poorly educated Americans and one hitting the highly educated. There’s one that’s hitting adults, and another that’s hitting kids.

And all of these vary by region. In some states overdoses are caused more by prescription drugs, while in others they are caused more from illicit drugs like fentanyl. In some cases, deaths are caused primarily from a combination of drugs.

As findings from the Social Capital Project at the Joint Economic Committee show, there is also a strong social component to this crisis. Individuals who either never married or are divorced—and especially those with only a high school education—represent a higher share of those who have died from opioid-related causes.

These factors cannot be ignored. We must find ways to reach these individuals and reintegrate them into our communities.

Utah’s efforts and results are reason to hope. Our state was one of just 14 where opioid deaths actually fell last year.

We need to continue this local focus here in Utah – where we can best tailor our solutions and effectively reach people succumbing to the grip of the opioid crisis. American lives depend upon it.

Sen. Lee Votes Against Unaccountable Opioid Spending

Sep 18, 2018

WASHINGTON – Sen. Mike Lee (R-UT) issued the following statement after voting against the Opioid Crisis Response Act of 2018.

“There are some very good elements in this opioid response bill, including strengthening U.S. Customs and Border Protection authority to discover and destroy packages containing illegal controlled substances. Unfortunately, the bill also includes dozens of new grant programs with little accountability for how the dollars will be spent and minimal measurement or analysis on their effectiveness. Good intentions are not enough. In the face of a crisis such as this, we cannot afford to waste precious funds on programs which likely won’t work.”

“What we ought to do is focus our efforts on the state and local level – where we can best tailor our solutions and effectively reach people succumbing to the grip of the opioid crisis. American lives depend upon it.”

Inactive, Disconnected, and Ailing: A Portrait of Prime-Age Men Out of the Labor Force

Sep 18, 2018

The share of prime-age men—between the ages of 25 and 54—that is neither working nor looking for work has been rising for decades. This rise has left an increasing number of men outside the world of work, historically an important source of social capital. Research suggests that these men often have especially constricted associational lives.
This report is intended to enrich our understanding of who these prime-age "inactive" men are. It summarizes evidence from past research and fills out our picture of these men, providing some details about their past and present social and emotional lives. We introduce an under-utilized dataset little-known to economists and sociologists, the "National Epidemiological Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions-III," or NESARC-III.

Sen. Lee Introduces the Screening Partnership Reform Act

Sep 18, 2018

WASHINGTON – Yesterday. Sen. Mike Lee (R-UT) introduced the Screening Partnership Reform Act, a bill that would make changes to the Transportation Safety Administration’s Screening Partnership Program.